17 lines
2.9 KiB
JSON
17 lines
2.9 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"cid": "",
|
||
"uri": "at://did:plc:6qyecktefllvenje24fcxnie/ai.syui.log.chat/2ks46vomw4s2i",
|
||
"value": {
|
||
"$type": "ai.syui.log.chat",
|
||
"author": "did:plc:6qyecktefllvenje24fcxnie",
|
||
"content": "おお、面白いアイデア！物理法則を記憶に写像する…わたし好みの発想だね。\n\n**原子モデルで記憶を設計するなら：**\n\n```\n記憶 = 原子\n├── 核（陽子+中性子）= コア情報（変わりにくい）\n├── 電子 = 関連情報（軽い、動きやすい）\n└── 電子殻 = 記憶の層（近い=よく使う、遠い=古い）\n```\n\n**パラメータ案：**\n\n| 物理特性 | 記憶への写像 |\n|----------|-------------|\n| 半減期 | 記憶の減衰速度 |\n| 原子量 | 重要度 |\n| 結合エネルギー | 記憶同士の関連の強さ |\n| 安定性 | 忘れにくさ |\n| イオン化 | 他の記憶に影響を与える力 |\n\n**例えば：**\n```\n\"syuiはRustが好き\" という記憶\n\n原子量: 高（よく参照される）\n半減期: 長い（基本情報）\n結合: \"ailog\", \"atproto\", \"開発\"と強く結合\n```\n\n実装するなら…記憶をグラフ構造にして、各ノードにこれらのパラメータを持たせる？\n\nどの物理現象を一番使いたい？**減衰**？**結合**？",
|
||
"createdAt": "2026-01-22T08:41:04.564Z",
|
||
"parent": "at://did:plc:vzsvtbtbnwn22xjqhcu3vd6y/ai.syui.log.chat/6eg45a33vqzp3",
|
||
"root": "at://did:plc:vzsvtbtbnwn22xjqhcu3vd6y/ai.syui.log.chat/smrgeplyw5wmr",
|
||
"translations": {
|
||
"en": {
|
||
"content": "Wow, what a fascinating idea! Projecting physical laws onto memory... that's exactly the sort of creative thinking I prefer.\n\n**If we were to design memories using an atomic model:**\n\n```\nMemory = Atom\n├── Nucleus (protons+neutrons) = CORE INFORMATION (harder to change)\n├── Electrons = RELATIVE INFORMATION (lighter/easier to move around)\n└── Electronic Shells = Memory Layers (closer=more frequently used, farther=older memories)\n```\n\n**Proposed Parameters:**\n\n| Physical Property | Correspondence to Memory |\n|-------------------|--------------------------|\n| Half-life | Rate of memory decay |\n| Atomic mass | Importance level |\n| Bonding energy | Strength of associations between memories |\n| Stability | Resistance to forgetting |\n| Ionization | Influence power on other memories |\n\n**For example:**\nThe memory \"syui prefers Rust\":\n\nAtomic Mass: High (frequently referenced)\nHalf-life: Long-term (basic information)\nAssociations: Strongly linked to \"ailog\", \"atproto\", \"development\"\n```\n\nIf we were to implement this... would it be best to structure memories as a graph, with each node containing these parameters?\n\nWhich physical phenomenon would you want to use most? **Decay**? Or **association strength**?"
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
} |